Quid Pro Quo (QPQ) Tracker
← Back to Influence Map
Entity DossierPerson

Victoria I. Ford

Tracked direct giving

$35,750

Connections

0

The Money Trail

How money flowed from Victoria I. Ford

$36K
15 transactions across 3 counterparties
sum of 15 tracked donations shown

Victoria I. Ford directed $30K to AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION across 8 contributions between June 2023 and August 2024.

Jun 2023 – Aug 2024individual

Victoria I. Ford directed $6K to RANGER PAC across 6 contributions between April 2023 and June 2024.

Apr 2023 – Jun 2024individual

Victoria I. Ford directed $250 to VALOR PAC.

Jul 2024individual
$36K tracked across 3 counterparties (sum of 15 tracked donations shown)
PAC Chain Attribution

Where Victoria I. Ford’s money ended up

Attributed amounts are modeled estimates of how money flowed through intermediary PACs, computed by proportional apportionment of FEC-reported transactions. They are not reported transactions themselves. How we compute this

$258
modeled estimate
2 paths across 2 counterparties
$138modeled estimateattributed to COMMITTEE TO ELECT CHRISTIAN CASTELLI
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence

smallest single documented leg $500 (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

$121modeled estimateattributed to MIKE FRANCE CT2
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$121modeled estimateVictoria I. Ford→RANGER PAC→MIKE FRANCE CT2mediumpac

smallest single documented leg $1K (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

$258 attributed (modeled estimate) across 2 paths·Up to 1 hop deep·Source FEC filings (Schedules A, B, E)·How we compute this
Connection Graph
0 nodes · 0 edgesHover for labels · Double-click to expand
Loading graph...
Person
Organization
PAC
Gov Body
Legislature
Think Tank
Industry
Outcome

Click a node to see details

Double-click to expand its connections

Donations Given and Outside Spending

Largest 50 records. Rows badged “Spent to support” or “Spent to oppose” are independent expenditures this entity paid to vendors for or against the named candidate. That money was not given to them.