Quid Pro Quo (QPQ) Tracker
← Back to Influence Map
Entity DossierPerson

ERICKSON, MIKE

Tracked donations to candidate

None in tracked data

IE against this entity (not received)

$509,236

Connections

1

Independent expenditures are paid by outside groups to ad and mail vendors. None of that money reached this entity's committee, and none of it is counted as a receipt.

PAC Chain Attribution

Who funded ERICKSON, MIKE

Attributed amounts are modeled estimates of how money flowed through intermediary PACs, computed by proportional apportionment of FEC-reported transactions. They are not reported transactions themselves. How we compute this

$23K
modeled estimate
50 paths across 50 counterparties
$3Kmodeled estimatefrom Amalgamated Bank
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$3Kmodeled estimateAmalgamated Bank→CHC BOLD PAC→ERICKSON, MIKEmediumOppose24A

smallest single documented leg $747

$1Kmodeled estimatefrom Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$1Kmodeled estimateFairmont Hotels & Resorts→CHC BOLD PAC→ERICKSON, MIKEmediumOppose24A

smallest single documented leg $20K (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

$676modeled estimatefrom Morongo Band Of Mission Indians
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$676modeled estimateMorongo Band Of Mission Indians→CHC BOLD PAC→ERICKSON, MIKEmediumOppose24A

smallest single documented leg $5K (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

$676modeled estimatefrom Poarch Band Of Creek Indians
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$676modeled estimatePoarch Band Of Creek Indians→CHC BOLD PAC→ERICKSON, MIKEmediumOppose24A

smallest single documented leg $5K (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence

smallest single documented leg $5K (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

$676modeled estimatefrom Federated Indians Of Graton Rancheria
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence

smallest single documented leg $5K (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

$676modeled estimatefrom San Manuel Band Of Mission Indians
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$676modeled estimateSan Manuel Band Of Mission Indians→CHC BOLD PAC→ERICKSON, MIKEmediumOppose24A

smallest single documented leg $5K (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

$581modeled estimatefrom Molly White
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$581modeled estimateMolly White→CHC BOLD PAC→ERICKSON, MIKEmediumOppose24A

smallest single documented leg $600 (larger than the modeled estimate: the leg carried money from other sources too)

Plus 42 additional chains totaling $15K.

$23K attributed (modeled estimate) across 50 paths·Up to 2 hops deep·Source FEC filings (Schedules A, B, E)·How we compute this

Outside Spending and Dark Money

Dark money is election spending by organizations that do not disclose their donors: 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, 501(c)(6) trade associations, and similar non-committee filers (FEC Form 5 and Form 9). Registered super PACs also make independent expenditures. But they itemize their donors with the FEC, so their spending is not dark money. Figures below are never combined with disclosed-donor totals.

Outside Spending About This Entity

Every independent expenditure and electioneering communication in the tracked filings that names this entity, by any filer. Most filers here are super PACs that disclose their donors. Only the non-committee nonprofits among them are dark money.

FilerAmountTypeSupport/OpposeDate
CHC BOLD PAC$509,236Form 5 IEOpposingOct 9, 2024

Money spent by non-disclosing organizations on ads and communications referencing this candidate. These dollars do not flow to the candidate's committee.

Methodology Disclosure

Dark money figures are derived from FEC Form 5 (independent expenditures by non-committee organizations) and Form 9 (electioneering communications). These filings capture spending on ads and election communications but do not reveal the identity of the organization's donors. QPQ totals may differ from benchmarks like the Brennan Center's estimates. QPQ includes all Form 5 filers, while some benchmarks count only a subset of non-disclosing nonprofits. Grant chain data is from IRS Form 990 Schedule I and may not include all years or all grantee organizations.

Connection Graph
0 nodes · 0 edgesHover for labels · Double-click to expand
Loading graph...
Person
Organization
PAC
Gov Body
Legislature
Think Tank
Industry
Outcome

Click a node to see details

Double-click to expand its connections

Election Results

YearOfficeStatePartyResultTotal RaisedTracked direct PAC giving
2024US HouseORLost$1,190,897—
2022US HouseORResult not sourced$3,957,227—

Donations Received and Outside Spending

Largest 50 records. Badged rows are independent expenditures other groups paid to vendors for or against this entity. That money did not reach its committee.

DonorAmountDateCycle
CHC BOLD PACSpent to oppose−$509,236Oct 9, 20242024

Relationships

TypeConnected ToDetailsSource
Affiliated withMIKE ERICKSON FOR CONGRESSMIKE ERICKSON FOR CONGRESS is the principal campaign committee of ERICKSON, MIKE (FEC committee C00809178, designation P; candidate H2OR06124).Source