Quid Pro Quo (QPQ) Tracker
← Back to Influence Map
Entity DossierThink Tank

Heartland Institute

IL

Tracked direct receipts exceed tracked direct giving by

$17,500

Free-market think tank known for climate skepticism and deregulation advocacy.

chemicalsthink tanksconservative policyenergy

Tracked direct giving

$0

Tracked receipts

$17,500

Connections

12

The Money Trail

How money flowed to Heartland Institute

$18K
4 transactions across 4 counterparties
sum of 4 tracked donations shown
$18K tracked across 4 counterparties (sum of 4 tracked donations shown)

Outside Spending and Dark Money

Dark money is election spending by organizations that do not disclose their donors: 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, 501(c)(6) trade associations, and similar non-committee filers (FEC Form 5 and Form 9). Registered super PACs also make independent expenditures. But they itemize their donors with the FEC, so their spending is not dark money. Figures below are never combined with disclosed-donor totals.

IRS 990 Schedule I Grant Chain

Grants between nonprofits reported on IRS Form 990 Schedule I. Grants between organizations are one route for dark money. A nonprofit may receive a grant from one entity and then spend that money on election ads.

IRS 990 Schedule I grants received

$136,323

GrantorAmountTax YearPurpose
DonorsTrust$25,0002024for environmental research
National Christian Charitable Foundation$7,9002024CIVIL RIGHTS
Schwab Charitable$83,7002023PUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFIT
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INC$19,7232022SUPPORT OF MISSION

Source: IRS Form 990 Schedule I (Grants and Other Assistance to Organizations) via ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer and IRS 990 XML e-files. Grant amounts represent the most recent filing year available.

IRS 990 data lags a year or more behind filing. Grants shown are for the stated tax year and do not establish current-cycle funding.

Methodology Disclosure

Dark money figures are derived from FEC Form 5 (independent expenditures by non-committee organizations) and Form 9 (electioneering communications). These filings capture spending on ads and election communications but do not reveal the identity of the organization's donors. QPQ totals may differ from benchmarks like the Brennan Center's estimates. QPQ includes all Form 5 filers, while some benchmarks count only a subset of non-disclosing nonprofits. Grant chain data is from IRS Form 990 Schedule I and may not include all years or all grantee organizations.

Connected Government Contracts

Companies that Heartland Institute holds stock in, is employed by, or receives donations from (through a corporate PAC) that also receive federal awards. Figures are each company's total federal obligations over the fiscal years this tracker holds FEC data for, as reported by USASpending.gov.

Received contributions from a PAC of

Received direct contributions from a PAC affiliated with this company

$5.1B

federal obligations FY2015–FY2025

Health and Human Services: $5.1BVeterans Affairs: $2.0Mthe Interior: $1.6M+3 more

Stock disclosures from Senate EFD / House Financial Disclosures. Contract data from USASpending.gov. Contributions and contracts are separate records. Neither is shown as a cause of the other, and a connection does not imply wrongdoing.

Connection Graph
0 nodes · 0 edgesHover for labels · Double-click to expand
Loading graph...
Person
Organization
PAC
Gov Body
Legislature
Think Tank
Industry
Outcome

Click a node to see details

Double-click to expand its connections

Donations Received and Outside Spending

Largest 50 records. Badged rows are independent expenditures other groups paid to vendors for or against this entity. That money did not reach its committee.

DonorAmountDateCycle
Growth Energy PAC$5,000Mar 21, 20242024
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES PAC$5,000May 18, 20232024
Merck & Co. Inc. PAC$5,000Sep 15, 20242024
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION PAC (BIO PAC)$2,500Mar 16, 20232024

Relationships

TypeConnected ToDetailsSource
Published research forInflation Reduction Act (IRA)Published research opposing IRA climate provisions as economically harmfulEditorial
Shaped policyEPA Clean Power Plan rollbackHeartland advocacy and legal strategy contributed to Supreme Court stay of Clean Power Plan.Editorial
Hosts research funded byKoch IndustriesFunder of climate skepticism research via Heartland InstituteEditorial
Hosts research funded byExxonMobilFunded Heartland climate research programs through 2006Editorial
Hosts research funded byAmerican Petroleum InstituteTrade association funding of climate researchEditorial
Hosts research funded bySouthernSouthern Company funder of Heartland InstituteEditorial
Hosts research funded byDonors Capital FundDonors Capital Fund donated ~$6.0M to Heartland Institute (2008-2022)Editorial
Hosts research funded byDonorsTrustDonorsTrust donated ~$4.0M to Heartland Institute (2008-2023)Editorial
Received money fromSchwab CharitableIRS 990 Schedule I grant of $83,700 (tax year 2023). Purpose: PUBLIC, SOCIETAL BENEFITSource
Received money fromDonorsTrustIRS 990 Schedule I grant of $25,000 (tax year 2024). Purpose: for environmental researchSource
Received money fromNational Christian Charitable FoundationIRS 990 Schedule I grant of $7,900 (tax year 2024). Purpose: CIVIL RIGHTSSource
Received money fromCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY INCIRS 990 Schedule I grant of $19,723 (tax year 2022). Purpose: SUPPORT OF MISSIONSource