Rulemaking · Federal Reserve · Mar 27, 2026
Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory Capital and Standardized Approach for Risk-Weighted Assets
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation are proposing to modify certain aspects of the regulatory capital rule (the proposal). The proposal would revise the risk-based capital treatment of certain exposure categories under the standardized approach, focusing on improving the calibration and risk sensitivity of risk weights that are particularly material to covered banking organizations' lending activities. The proposal would also modify the definition of regulatory capital by removing the threshold- based deduction for mortgage servicing assets for all banking organizations subject to the regulatory capital rule, including banking organizations subject to the community bank leverage ratio framework. In addition, the proposal would require Category III and IV banking organizations to recognize most elements of accumulated other comprehensive income in their regulatory capital. The agencies are concurrently publishing a separate proposal, which would require Category I and II banking organizations to use a new framework to calculate risk-weighted assets, called the expanded risk-based approach and would allow other banking organizations to elect to use the expanded risk-based approach.
- Docket or bill
- 2026-05960
- Official record
- https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/27/2026-05960/regulatory-capital-rules-regulatory-capital-and-standardized-approach-for-risk-weighted-assets
- Tracked as
- Regulatory Capital Rules: Regulatory Capital and Standardized Approach for Risk-Weighted Assets
- Issued by
- Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Department of the Treasury
Traceable spending around this event
Tracked direct contributions from finance banking donors to candidates in the year before the event, with transfers to PACs and parties and independent expenditures reported apart, and lobbying on BAN, FIN issue codes in the surrounding window. These are partial, tracked figures scoped to a window, not totals for the industry. Independent expenditures are spent for or against candidates, not given to them, and are never added to the giving figures.
Giving window: Mar 27, 2025 – Mar 27, 2026. Donation records in this database currently run through Oct 20, 2026; lobbying filings through 2026. Figures computed Oct 29, 2026.
Tracked direct giving to candidates (finance banking)
$0
0 contributions to person recipients
Transfers to PACs and parties (finance banking)
$1,201,085
168 contributions to non-person recipients
IE support
$0
0 independent expenditures for candidates
IE oppose
$0
0 independent expenditures against candidates
Lobbying (BAN, FIN)
$920,751,276
2,886 filings, whole-filing LDA totals
Positions on record
0
none recorded
Giving to candidates, transfers to PACs, independent expenditures and lobbying are separate figures and are not summed.
Positions
No entity positions are recorded for this event yet. Positions are shown only where an entity has a cited stance on the record. Stances inferred from donations are not shown.
Top lobbying on these issues
Clients with the most reported lobbying spend on BAN, FIN issue codes in the window around the event. Lobbying reports cover multiple issues, so spend is not attributable to this event alone.
- CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.$70,290,000 · 4 filings
- WALMART INC$14,390,000 · 22 filings
- NATIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING COUNCIL INC$12,890,000 · 6 filings
- NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS$12,402,000 · 6 filings
- Boeing$11,340,000 · 4 filings
- AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE$9,371,000 · 12 filings
- REAL ESTATE ROUNDTABLE$7,475,192 · 15 filings
- DELTA AIR LINES, INC.$7,460,000 · 5 filings
Figures are drawn from tracked FEC donations and Senate LDA lobbying disclosures held in this database. See the methodology for how spending is scoped to an event window. The spending shown is publicly disclosed, and no violation of law is alleged. Its timing does not establish that any spending caused the outcome.