Quid Pro Quo (QPQ) Tracker
← Back to Influence Map
Entity DossierPerson

DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.

Federal candidate, office H, state AL

Tracked donations to candidate

None in tracked data

IE against this entity (not received)

$238,153

Connections

2

Independent expenditures are paid by outside groups to ad and mail vendors. None of that money reached this entity's committee, and none of it is counted as a receipt.

The Money Trail

How money flowed to DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.

$238K
5 transactions across 1 counterparty
sum of 5 tracked donations shown

Protect Progress spent $238K opposing DANIELS, ANTHONY REP. across 5 contributions between April 2024 and April 2024. Protect Progress advocates for CLARITY Act, Digital Asset Market Clarity Act.

Apr 2024 – Apr 2024independent expenditure→ CLARITY Act, Digital Asset Market Clarity Act no recorded vote
$238K tracked across 1 counterparty (sum of 5 tracked donations shown)·1 policy outcome
PAC Chain Attribution

Who funded DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.

Attributed amounts are modeled estimates of how money flowed through intermediary PACs, computed by proportional apportionment of FEC-reported transactions. They are not reported transactions themselves. How we compute this

$237K
modeled estimate
37 paths across 31 counterparties
$52Kmodeled estimatefrom Coinbase, Inc.
2024 cycle2 paths1–2 hopsMedium confidence
$28Kmodeled estimateCoinbase, Inc.→Fairshake→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$24Kmodeled estimateCoinbase, Inc.→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$25Kmodeled estimatefrom HOROWITZ, BEN
2024 cycle2 paths1–2 hopsMedium confidence
$13Kmodeled estimateHOROWITZ, BEN→Fairshake→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$12Kmodeled estimateHOROWITZ, BEN→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$25Kmodeled estimatefrom Marc Andreessen
2024 cycle2 paths1–2 hopsMedium confidence
$13Kmodeled estimateMarc Andreessen→Fairshake→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$12Kmodeled estimateMarc Andreessen→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$24Kmodeled estimateA16Z Capital Management, L.L.C. (Andreessen Horowitz)→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$24Kmodeled estimatefrom Ripple Labs Inc.
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$24Kmodeled estimateRipple Labs Inc.→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$24Kmodeled estimatefrom AH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$24Kmodeled estimateAH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$24Kmodeled estimatefrom COINBASE
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$24Kmodeled estimateCOINBASE→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

$8Kmodeled estimatefrom Ronald Conway
2024 cycle1 path1 hopMedium confidence
$8Kmodeled estimateRonald Conway→Protect Progress→DANIELS, ANTHONY REP.mediumOpposeindependent_expenditure

smallest single documented leg $765

Plus 23 additional chains totaling $30K.

$237K attributed (modeled estimate) across 37 paths·Up to 2 hops deep·Source FEC filings (Schedules A, B, E)·How we compute this

Outside Spending and Dark Money

Dark money is election spending by organizations that do not disclose their donors: 501(c)(4) social welfare organizations, 501(c)(6) trade associations, and similar non-committee filers (FEC Form 5 and Form 9). Registered super PACs also make independent expenditures. But they itemize their donors with the FEC, so their spending is not dark money. Figures below are never combined with disclosed-donor totals.

Outside Spending About This Entity

Every independent expenditure and electioneering communication in the tracked filings that names this entity, by any filer. Most filers here are super PACs that disclose their donors. Only the non-committee nonprofits among them are dark money.

FilerAmountTypeSupport/OpposeDate
Protect Progress$182,224Form 5 IEOpposingApr 10, 2024
Protect Progress$23,329Form 5 IEOpposingApr 10, 2024
Protect Progress$20,211Form 5 IEOpposingApr 10, 2024
Protect Progress$11,625Form 5 IEOpposingApr 30, 2024
Protect Progress$765Form 5 IEOpposingApr 30, 2024

Money spent by non-disclosing organizations on ads and communications referencing this candidate. These dollars do not flow to the candidate's committee.

Methodology Disclosure

Dark money figures are derived from FEC Form 5 (independent expenditures by non-committee organizations) and Form 9 (electioneering communications). These filings capture spending on ads and election communications but do not reveal the identity of the organization's donors. QPQ totals may differ from benchmarks like the Brennan Center's estimates. QPQ includes all Form 5 filers, while some benchmarks count only a subset of non-disclosing nonprofits. Grant chain data is from IRS Form 990 Schedule I and may not include all years or all grantee organizations.

Connection Graph
0 nodes · 0 edgesHover for labels · Double-click to expand
Loading graph...
Person
Organization
PAC
Gov Body
Legislature
Think Tank
Industry
Outcome

Click a node to see details

Double-click to expand its connections

Election Results

YearOfficeStatePartyResultTotal RaisedTracked direct PAC giving
2024US HouseALResult not sourced$567,548—

Donations Received and Outside Spending

Largest 50 records. Badged rows are independent expenditures other groups paid to vendors for or against this entity. That money did not reach its committee.

DonorAmountDateCycle
Protect ProgressSpent to oppose−$182,224Apr 10, 20242024
Protect ProgressSpent to oppose−$23,329Apr 10, 20242024
Protect ProgressSpent to oppose−$20,211Apr 10, 20242024
Protect ProgressSpent to oppose−$11,625Apr 30, 20242024
Protect ProgressSpent to oppose−$765Apr 30, 20242024

Relationships

TypeConnected ToDetailsSource
Opposed byProtect ProgressIndependent expenditures totaling $728,896.00 across 4 filingsSource
Affiliated withANTHONY DANIELS FOR ALABAMAANTHONY DANIELS FOR ALABAMA is the principal campaign committee of DANIELS, ANTHONY REP. (FEC committee C00856203, designation P; candidate H4AL02162).Source