PurchasingPolicy.orgPURCHASINGPOLICYBETA
← Back to Influence Map
Entity DossierPAC

AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC

DC

Tracked giving exceeds tracked receipts by

$127,000

insurance
Cycle

Tracked PAC giving

$127,000

Tracked receipts

$0

Connections

2

The Money Trail

How money flowed from AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC

$52K
15 transactions across 8 counterparties

AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC directed $10K to Charles Schumer across 2 contributions. Charles Schumer voted YES on Disapproval of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 — which AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC advocates for.

AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC directed $9K to DELBENE FOR CONGRESS across 4 contributions between June 2021 and June 2022. AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC advocates for GENIUS Act, Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (S.394).

Jun 2021 – Jun 2022pac GENIUS Act, Guiding and Establishing National Inno… no recorded vote

AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC directed $8K to HUIZENGA FOR CONGRESS across 2 contributions between March 2023 and September 2023. AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC advocates for GENIUS Act, Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (S.394).

Mar 2023 – Sep 2023pac GENIUS Act, Guiding and Establishing National Inno… no recorded vote

AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC directed $4K to VIRGIN ISLANDS FOR PLASKETT across 2 contributions between September 2023 and September 2024. AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC advocates for GENIUS Act, Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (S.394).

Sep 2023 – Sep 2024pac GENIUS Act, Guiding and Establishing National Inno… no recorded vote

AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC also gave to 3 other entities totaling $7K.

$52K tracked across 8 counterparties·2 policy outcomes·1 aligned·1 contradiction
PAC Chain Attribution

Where AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC’s money ended up

Attributed amounts are modeled estimates of how money flowed through intermediary PACs, computed by proportional apportionment of FEC-reported transactions. They are not reported transactions themselves. How we compute this

$5K
modeled estimate
1 path across 1 counterparty
$5Kmodeled estimateattributed to Charles Schumer
2024 cycle1 path0 hopsMedium confidence

at least $5K documented end-to-end

$5K attributed (modeled estimate) across 1 path·Up to 0 hops deep·Source FEC filings (Schedules A, B, E)·How we compute this
Connection Graph
0 nodes · 0 edgesHover for labels · Double-click to expand
Loading graph...
Person
Organization
PAC
Gov Body
Legislature
Think Tank
Industry
Outcome

Click a node to see details

Double-click to expand its connections

Donations Given

RecipientAmountDateCycle
DSCC$15,000Sep 20, 20222022
DSCC$15,000Sep 30, 20212022
DSCC$15,000Jun 26, 20182018
DSCC$15,000Feb 11, 20162016
DSCC$15,000Jan 26, 20152016
DSCC$15,000May 10, 20172018
HUIZENGA FOR CONGRESS$5,000Mar 31, 20232024
Charles Schumer$5,000Sep 25, 20242024
DELBENE FOR CONGRESS$3,000Jun 28, 20212022
DELBENE FOR CONGRESS$2,500Jun 21, 20222022
VIRGIN ISLANDS FOR PLASKETT$2,500Sep 29, 20232024
HUIZENGA FOR CONGRESS$2,500Jun 17, 20242024
HUIZENGA FOR CONGRESS$2,500Sep 30, 20232024
RICK W. ALLEN FOR CONGRESS$2,500Jun 21, 20242024
DELBENE FOR CONGRESS$2,000May 4, 20222022
SCOTT FITZGERALD FOR CONGRESS$2,000Sep 13, 20232024
VIRGIN ISLANDS FOR PLASKETT$1,500Sep 30, 20242024
DELBENE FOR CONGRESS$1,000May 4, 20222022
AMODEI FOR NEVADA$1,000Mar 28, 20242024
BALDERSON FOR CONGRESS$1,000Mar 31, 20232024
WENSTRUP FOR CONGRESS$1,000May 23, 20232024
BALDERSON FOR CONGRESS$1,000Mar 19, 20242024
SCOTT FITZGERALD FOR CONGRESS$1,000Sep 28, 20232024

Relationships

TypeConnected ToDetailsSource
Advocated forDisapproval of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 121AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC supported candidates who engaged with this policy outcomeEditorial
Advocated forGENIUS Act, Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (S.394)AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS PAC supported candidates who engaged with this policy outcomeEditorial